Racism in Heart of Darkness

Racism in Heart of Darkness

Chinua Achebe, a well-known writer, once
gave a lecture at the University of Massachusetts about Joseph Conrad's

Heart of Darkness, entitled "An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrad's Heart
of Darkness." Throughout his essay, Achebe notes how Conrad used Africa
as a background only, and how he "set Africa up as a foil to Europe,"(Achebe,
p.251) while he also "projects the image of Africa as 'the other world,'
the antithesis of Europe and therefore of civilization."(Achebe, p.252)

By his own interpretations of the text, Achebe shows that Conrad eliminates"the African as a human factor," thereby "reducing Africa to the role of
props."(Achebe, p.257)

In supporting these accusations against

Conrad, Achebe cites specific examples from the text, while also, pointing
out that there is a lack of certain characteristics among the characters.

Achebe then compares the descriptions of the Intended and the native woman.

Explaining that the savage "fulfills a structural requirement of the story:
a savage counterpart to the refined European woman," and also that the
biggest "difference is the one implied in the author's bestowal of human
expression to the one and the withholding of it from the other."(Achebe,
p.255) This lack of human expression and human characteristics is what

Achebe says contributes to the overflowing amount of racism within Conrad's
novella. Human expression, is one of few things that make us different
from animals, along with such things as communication and reason. This
of course, being that without human expression, the native woman is considered
more of a "savage...wild-eyed and magnificent," (Achebe quoting Conrad,
p. 255), possibly even "bestial."

In an attempt to refute Achebe's proposed
difference between the two women, C.P. Sarvan said that Conrad perceived
the native woman as a "gorgeous, proud, superb, magnificent, terrific,
[and] fierce" person whose "human feelings [were] not denied."(Sarvan,
p. 284) In comparing the two views, one must step back and consider that
both views are only interpretations on what Conrad may have intended. Since
no one can ever really know what his actual meanings were for these two
women being so similar (in their movements), and yet so different (in their
character), only individual explanation can be brought up. This in particular,
is what brings me to question both Achebe and Sarvan's points. By reorganizing

Conrad's descriptive words, Sarvan was able to propose that Conrad did
not intend for the mistress to be perceived as the "savage counterpart."(Achebe,
p. 255) Yet, at the same time, both Sarvan and Achebe each write about
what they think to be the right thing. It seems to me that Achebe was looking
for racism in this short novel, and that Sarvan was so taken back by Achebe's
accusations, that he himself, went and looked for ways to defend Conrad.

However, this particular shortcoming of
the native woman, is not the only one that Achebe finds. As stated earlier,
communication is very important in our society and to "civilization" (as
known by the Europeans of the time). While reading Heart of Darkness, I
noticed a significant difference in the levels of communication that were
allotted between the Europeans and the Africans. This drastic difference
in speech was at the core of Achebe's argument that Conrad deprived the

Africans of human qualities. Achebe pointed out that "in place of speech
they made 'a violent babble of uncouth sounds,'" also saying that "it is
clearly not of Conrad's purpose to confer language on the 'rudimentary
souls' of Africa." (Achebe, p. 255) Here lies the problem that I have with

Achebe's article. Assuming that the lack of speech (in Conrad's eyes) is
a racist factor--which is a valid assumption--Achebe still did not support
his comment that "Conrad was a thoroughgoing racist."(Achebe, p. 257) Without
outside knowledge (beyond the book), Achebe had no basis to charge Conrad
with this rather harsh comment.

By completely agreeing with either writer,

I would be denying myself the right to find my own opinion regarding racism
in Heart of Darkness. So, I stand now and say that depending on one's interpretation
of Joseph Conrad's writing, there will be plenty of racism found (if looked
for). What I do believe is that during the time that this novella was written,

Conrad lived in a society where African people were not considered equal,
to man, they were even considered sub-human. Not to excuse Conrad, but
racism was everywhere and what came from it was people who wrote about
it naturally and who did not think of a "politically correct" way to put
things. If this novella had been written today, it might have been said
that the Africans spoke "in a language that was