Spring And Fall


The play Educating Rita by Willy Russell gained great popularity
especially during the early eighties. There has also been a movie made
from it starring Julie Walters and the more famous Michael Caine. As so
often the case, the movie was more elaborate with additional scenes,
some of which were spoken of or retold by the actors in the play. The
movie also included several actors while the play only featured two,

Frank and Rita.

After having read the play and seen the movie I am struck by a number
of differences. Seemingly subtle, many small details have a great impact
on how the story can and is being perceived. The movie offers much more
background information on other characters and events that are important
to the story.

'The Screenwriter's Bible' by David Trottier offers a good insight in
script writing and story structure. It deals with the basic elements of
a typical screenplay, and explains what it actually is that an audience
craves. Many of the principles can and should be applied to any story
whether a screenplay, theatric play, novel or short story.

The play is much more predictable in the sense that a great many
things are bound not to happen on stage. In fact nothing taking place
outside Frank's office can be seen by the audience. All action is
inevitably confined within these four walls. When Frank invites Rita to
his home for dinner in the play the audience are not set up for
suspension as to how it will turn out since they already know that
whatever happens will not take place before them, but will be retold.

The movie is several scenes richer. Some of these scenes are in the
play retold by the actors and some of them are not there at all. Scene
three in act two begins with Frank cursing "Sod them-no fuck them! Fuck
them, eh, Rita? Neither Rita or the audience have the first clue as to
what he is referring to. As the dialogue progresses they audience is
informed that he is upset because the students reported him since he had
been very drunk while giving his last lecture. The audience never get to
see the actual scene where this happens. The can never witness Frank
staggering and slurring in front of the class. They are not given a fair
chance to make an assessment whether they accept Frank's behavior and
side with him, or if they think it serves him right to be reported.

David Trottier claims "Never tell what you can show. Be as visual as
possible. Rather than two ladies at tea commenting on the fact that

Darla skydives for relaxation, show us Darla actually jumping from a
plane, or show her coming home with a parachute and trying to stuff it
into the closet."

The fact that the audience meet with only two characters in the play
is limiting in the sense that a lot of information is implicit or even
withheld. David Trottier says "One key to making a drama dramatic is to
create a strong central character with a powerful goal, and then provide
a strong opposition character who tries to stop the central character
from achieving this goal. This assures us of conflict. And conflict is
drama." Denny, Rita's husband strongly opposes her spending time on
education. He wants her to have a baby and become a house-wife and
throughout most of the play he is trying make her quit what she is
doing. Denny is definitely the opposition character. In the play Rita
tells Frank that Denny has burnt all her books, and again the action is
retold. In the movie we actually get to see the anger and frenzy of

Denny, which gives a much more clear background and perhaps a deeper
understanding of Rita's conflict with her husband.

Another thing that sheds more light on things is the ending of the
movie which makes for a more definite resolution. In the end of the last
scene of the play Rita says "I'm gonna take ten years off you..." and
then proceeds to cut Frank's hair. The movie takes us a little further.

We get to see Frank's new haircut when he is at the airport and Rita has
come to see him off. They hug tenderly and part as friends with smiles
on their faces. What is perhaps even more important for the resolution
is that Frank actually gets on the plane to Australia. When reading the
play there is room for doubt whether he really took the plunge to do
what he said he would, or